CO129-537-6 Foreshores and Sea Bed Amendment Ordinance 1932 18-8-1932 - 17-1-1933 — Page 7

7

ill

to inform wall

leffects outside the Colony a wolf

Lobe glad

See (2) on 13717/1/33 & my minute of 21.1.33 thencon

which explains a misunderstanding. The objections of the HK, Chamber Commerce are against the Foreshore Sea Bed Works Bill

not against the foreshores & Sea Bedrmendment Brace.

Fuqameron

24.2·33

the FO

to consult the F.O.

may by consulted

sexy

regarding any particular Ordee which appears to have such under bearing. (on the present case the possible repercussions in Cuina were not realised at the time we

were considering the Proce. Enclove a copy of the desp suggested bellows saying it was assumed that

arquing that h. Order yould have no obyletion pa copy offer letter

Send

it was

copey

with

coper

|(9)

or enclos to Hongkong by short desp ref(8) asking that in any case where in the Loo's opinion a Hong Kong Drace may post have ill affects outside

far the Colony a particularly in linna

attention

may

be drawn to the

•binge

gcommunicat confidentially to the Goo of Hhlong

possibility when the Prace is forwarded for the signification of H. M's pleasure]

√31-12-32

(4) has crossed (7). I should puit [] until we get a refly from F.O. The desirable thing is that the it.K. Gurt. should bear in mind possible referenssions in China, and consult the 5.ofs., before they

introduce

hills into their Legislative Concil. J. A. Calder

3.1.33

Iff conson. Sie Ihmuckburgh should al aft

10

To Oade.

9.ANSWD